<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Having a personal conversation with a global movement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doublederivative.ca/2010/02/08/having-a-personal-conversation-with-a-global-movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doublederivative.ca/2010/02/08/having-a-personal-conversation-with-a-global-movement/</link>
	<description>Leadership that empowers the mission</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:18:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.doublederivative.ca/2010/02/08/having-a-personal-conversation-with-a-global-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublederivative.ca/?p=142#comment-920</guid>
		<description>What is an example of the &quot;messiness&quot; of many-to-many conversations?

Good point about the group being self-correcting.  I find in many-t0-many  collaborations, especially digital ones, is that you can&#039;t just dance and wave your arms to make a point.  Things are really transparent because someone can very quickly post a link that supports or denies a point someone is making.  I think digitally, we are forced to be more precise with our ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is an example of the &#8220;messiness&#8221; of many-to-many conversations?</p>
<p>Good point about the group being self-correcting.  I find in many-t0-many  collaborations, especially digital ones, is that you can&#8217;t just dance and wave your arms to make a point.  Things are really transparent because someone can very quickly post a link that supports or denies a point someone is making.  I think digitally, we are forced to be more precise with our ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McComas</title>
		<link>http://www.doublederivative.ca/2010/02/08/having-a-personal-conversation-with-a-global-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McComas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublederivative.ca/?p=142#comment-919</guid>
		<description>I was just thinking about this the other day as I was chatting with our regional operations director. We&#039;re contemplating some sort of virtual regional conference and how to align people to it.

 A big barrier in my mind is a general fear of the messiness of many-to-many conversations. As well as the fear of being misunderstood. But in my experience the group that&#039;s interacting seems to self-correct and the conversations are way more fun and engaging.

I think again it comes down to the command/control way of thinking vs. the collaboration model. The standard way of doing things in the past has stifled any initiative that anyone without a major authoritative title might have. I think some staff are afraid of taking the initiative in speaking out in whatever medium is available.

There&#039;s a lot more to it than that, but those are the thoughts off the top of my head. This topic sounds like a good blog post topic though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just thinking about this the other day as I was chatting with our regional operations director. We&#8217;re contemplating some sort of virtual regional conference and how to align people to it.</p>
<p> A big barrier in my mind is a general fear of the messiness of many-to-many conversations. As well as the fear of being misunderstood. But in my experience the group that&#8217;s interacting seems to self-correct and the conversations are way more fun and engaging.</p>
<p>I think again it comes down to the command/control way of thinking vs. the collaboration model. The standard way of doing things in the past has stifled any initiative that anyone without a major authoritative title might have. I think some staff are afraid of taking the initiative in speaking out in whatever medium is available.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot more to it than that, but those are the thoughts off the top of my head. This topic sounds like a good blog post topic though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.doublederivative.ca/2010/02/08/having-a-personal-conversation-with-a-global-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublederivative.ca/?p=142#comment-902</guid>
		<description>Hey Matt - great points.

What do you think are the barriers to having our staff communicate with each other in &quot;many-to-many&quot; conversations?  The platforms exist, but people aren&#039;t using them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt &#8211; great points.</p>
<p>What do you think are the barriers to having our staff communicate with each other in &#8220;many-to-many&#8221; conversations?  The platforms exist, but people aren&#8217;t using them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McComas</title>
		<link>http://www.doublederivative.ca/2010/02/08/having-a-personal-conversation-with-a-global-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McComas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublederivative.ca/?p=142#comment-868</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to comment on this for a while now. Couple of thoughts for you (in the context of our organization):

I think the first two points (at least the principles of them) should be a huge priority in our organization globally. 

Having access to regional and nationally directors via a blog (at the minimum) and/or social media puts a human face on the organization and helps us know what they&#039;re thinking about. The cost is minimal and the benefit of these tools can be great....can our staff grasp this? 

Secondly, I think we need to give some intentional thought not just creating a platform for volunteers to engage and communicate but also our staff. We have to grow in our ability to communicate with each other in &quot;many-to-many&quot; conversations. If we don&#039;t figure this out and create a new communication culture it makes me a little fearful for the future.

That&#039;s probably more of an affirmation than an answer. Oh well. 

Take care!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to comment on this for a while now. Couple of thoughts for you (in the context of our organization):</p>
<p>I think the first two points (at least the principles of them) should be a huge priority in our organization globally. </p>
<p>Having access to regional and nationally directors via a blog (at the minimum) and/or social media puts a human face on the organization and helps us know what they&#8217;re thinking about. The cost is minimal and the benefit of these tools can be great&#8230;.can our staff grasp this? </p>
<p>Secondly, I think we need to give some intentional thought not just creating a platform for volunteers to engage and communicate but also our staff. We have to grow in our ability to communicate with each other in &#8220;many-to-many&#8221; conversations. If we don&#8217;t figure this out and create a new communication culture it makes me a little fearful for the future.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s probably more of an affirmation than an answer. Oh well. </p>
<p>Take care!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.doublederivative.ca/2010/02/08/having-a-personal-conversation-with-a-global-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublederivative.ca/?p=142#comment-859</guid>
		<description>Thanks Russ!

I always enjoying reading your thoughts. They really challenge me to be better in what I do.

God bless.

U Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Russ!</p>
<p>I always enjoying reading your thoughts. They really challenge me to be better in what I do.</p>
<p>God bless.</p>
<p>U Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
